Divergent is a Veronica Roth’s 2011 bestseller. Now, the
film adaptation of the novel has people on different ends of the board. People
loved it. People hated it.
Peter Travers from Rolling Stone magazine definitely did
not like it. Patricia Garcia from Vogue magazine is a fan. Who do we believe?
Travers cuts straight to the chase by dissing the movie in
his lead claiming it couldn't stir palpitations in shut-ins and calling the
movie bland and lifeless. The word burn appeared in my head in capital leaders
and in flames.
While he’s in favor of the choice of Shailene Woodley
playing the protagonist, there was no onscreen chemistry between her and
Theo James who plays her love interest.
Travers blames director, Neil Burger for failing to perk
up the script.
Now on to Divergent’s cheerleader from Vogue. Garcia
claims that Divergent appeals to all audiences like “science fiction nerds,” “those suffering from Ryan Gosling withdrawal,” “indie film snobs,” “Spotify
addict,” and the “Hunger Games freak.”
Garcia compares Divergent to the novel Brave New World. I
have to respect this claim because in Divergent citizens are split up into
groups based on their personalities. Brave New World runs on a divided up class
system. This comparison gave the cheerleader a brain.
“Divergent will definitely appeal to those who
crave a little more postapocalyptic conflict in their lives.” And this is where
Garcia’s brain disappeared. A dystopian world and a post-apocalyptic world are
two different things! A dystopia is the opposite of utopia. It is an
undesirable society, while a post-apocalyptic world is a world after an
apocalypse.
